-- card: 27380 from stack: in.0 -- bmap block id: 0 -- flags: 0000 -- background id: 3797 -- name: -- part contents for background part 1 ----- text ----- From: chuq@plaid.Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) Date: 4 Mar 88 01:03:14 GMT Well, it's hit the newstand. HyperAge, the first HyperCard specialty magazine. It's got John Sculley on the cover. It's got Danny Goodman (rapidly nearing the record for most simultaneous columns, currently held by John "what, me worry?" Dvorak). It's got Ted Nelson, grand-pa-pa of HyperText. It's got Mitchell Waite, who's putting together some HyperCard books for the Waite Group. It's got lots of sizzle. And almost no substance. I was rather disappointed. Most first issues are, frankly, weak, because it's hard to get advertisers for an unknown with no reader or subscriber base, it's hard to get people lined up to write, it's hard to get hard news when you don't know your publishing schedule (first issues tend to happen when the money does, not when you plan them to). First issues are tough. Still, with the exception of Waite's column, there's lots of glitz and very little HyperCard. Ted Nelson rhapsodizes on the road to Hypertext. Danny Goodman talks about how he found God through HyperCard (well, not really, but it reads that way). There's an article on Lotus' Agenda (is it hypertext? What's it doing in a HyperCard magazine?). Mitchell Waite sits down and writes a NEAT script. The only scripts in the entire magazine. Good Stuff, here. Hope to see it continue. I'm being critical. I'm being REAL critical. It's not terrible. I'm not burning the magazine, in fact I'm sending in my charter subscription. Why? Because, while this issue is weak, it shows a lot of potential. Because this magazine can become Hyper-Tutor, which deserves support (and a few well placed letters). Or it can become Hyper-World, with glitz and gloss and few techical details, at which point I've wasted $20 to give it a chance to fulfill it's potential. To me, that's worth it. Take a look. If you're serious about HyperCard, think hard about subscribing, giving it a chance. If you do, let the editors know what you want in it, and with any luck, we'll get it. (before I go, one final note: the layout and typography is very simplistic and not terribly consistent. Hopefully when they get this thing moving forward they'll bring in someone who can make the words as pretty as they are useful... It's not bad, but it's not what I'd call a professional layout yet. I've seen much worse....) -- part contents for background part 45 ----- text ----- HyperAge Magazine, Volume 1, #1